Of course, in modern speech, as a written or oral, the word "galosha" (or "Kalosh") is rarely used. But nevertheless, it may well meet, in dictation, or write off, but if there may be cases. And here the question may arise: But how is it all right, Galosh or Kalosh? And the one and the other option can be found in books, textbooks and periodicals.
What version of writing is true: galosha or calica?
In fact, this topic can be arguing infinitely, to make some assumptions, seek various historical moments and howloving word formation. But in fact, there is no sense for a long time.
So, the words of Galosha and Kalosh in writing are completely equivalent, that is, to ensure that the choice of writing this or that writing can not be written. With dictionaries, these words are given as synonyms, that is, one completely without loss of meaning can replace the other.
However, if the selection of writing is of fundamental importance, then you can be guided by the age of the other word.
The word "Kalosh" in the intelligent dictionaries of various authors is marked as outdated. Galosha is a more modern version of writing and reading. Therefore, if the question arises, what exactly choose: Kalosh or Galosha, it makes sense to be bowed to a more modern version of the word, that is, "galosha".
However, if you write "Kalosh", then it will be necessary to read this error. Outcome: both versions of writing the words "galosha" and "Kalosh" have a place to be. If the choice arises, then preference should be given to the word "galosha" as more modern.
357
