How to cancel the decision on an administrative offense

Very often there are contradictions between government agencies and a simple person. There are situations when it seems that this penalty is discharged incorrectly and no offense. Each person can complain and try to cancel the actions that seem to him illegal. What do we have to do?

One of the main - the appeal period. After the protocol is issued from police officers, traffic police or utilities, there are only ten calendar days to file a complaint to revise these actions. Article 12.4 "of the law about appealing the decision on bringing to administrative responsibility".

There are only two options for solving the situation that has arisen - to consider this ruling by the administrative way or seek help in court. Both options are good, but better to test them consistently. If the deadlines have expired, and the documents are not filed - you can only appeal to the court.

First you need to write an administrative appeal to the superior structure. For example, if the protocol is discharged by the traffic police in the regional department, if the police in the higher police department, etc., to this document, attach a copy of the ruling and in detail, simple words to state the situation. Write how the state led himself. The employee, what exactly he is wrong, or as specifically violated the law. This statement is better to draw up with the help of a lawyer or lawyer, refer to the current Constitution and amendment. Such appeal will show the seriousness and preparedness of man. Documents can be submitted personally, and you can send by mail.

If the administrative authority has yet refused to consider the case - you need to go to court. There to attach all available documents and wait for the conclusion. But if the court did not decide in favor of the applicant, you can contact a higher authority and indicate which moments were missed and not considered legal performers.

If none of the options submitted a positive decision, the output is only one - to apply to the Supreme Court of the State. The main thing is to keep all the documents so that the actual evidence of the inaction and poor-quality work of the appeal bodies can be provided.